miércoles, mayo 18, 2016

New evidence of Roundup dangers

https://theintercept.com/2016/05/17/new-evidence-about-the-dangers-of-monsantos-roundup/

By Sharon Lerner

Until recently, the fight over Roundup has mostly focused on its active ingredient, glyphosate. But mounting evidence, including one study published in February, shows it’s not only glyphosate that’s dangerous, but also chemicals listed as “inert ingredients” in some formulations of Roundup and other glyphosate-based weed killers. Though they have been in herbicides — and our environment — for decades, these chemicals have evaded scientific scrutiny and regulation in large part because the companies that make and use them have concealed their identity as trade secrets.

Etiquetas: , , , ,

sábado, julio 18, 2015

From DDT to Roundup, by Evaggelos Vallianatos

Ruthless Power and Deleterious Politics: From DDT to Roundup 

Resistance is now taking a new form: the removal of global toxins, unfortunately, one at a time. In early 2015, the usually timid and agribusiness-friendly, World Health Organization, declared both glyphosate and 2,4-D probable human carcinogens. Following on this modest step, in May 14, 2015, the International Society of Doctors for the Environment, based in Basel, Switzerland, issued an appeal to the European governments: “To immediately and permanently ban, with no exceptions, the production, trade and use in all the EU territory of glyphosate-based herbicides.” The UK journalist, Georgina Downs,echoes that sentiment to include all pesticides.
Humans need a pesticides-free future. We need to appeal to all politicians all over the world to ban permanently and without exception all pesticides. Glyphosate represents all pesticides. Our message and policies should be telling agribusiness companies enough is enough: no more death rain. Monsanto, on the other hand, isbuilding additional facilities to manufacture another weed killer by the name of dicamba in order to mix it up with glyphosate. That way the joint product will be more effective against the super weeds resisting glyphosate.
Pesticides are chemical weapons. They were brought to market under the cover of questionable and often fraudulent science and regulation. They are maintained in farming under the false pretense of feeding the world. They are danger itself; they are biocides. They are simply the money lubricants of giant agriculture. They serve no public purpose. We don’t need them.

Etiquetas: , , ,

domingo, marzo 29, 2015

Scientist defends WHO group report linking herbicide to cancer

http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/03/26/us-monsanto-herbicide-idINKBN0MM2JR20150326

By Carey Gilliam

(Reuters) - A World Health Organization group's controversial finding that the world's most popular herbicide "probably is carcinogenic to humans" was based on a thorough scientific review and is a key marker in ongoing evaluations of the product, the scientist who led the study said Thursday.

"There were several studies. There was sufficient evidence in animals, limited evidence in humans and strong supporting evidence showing DNA mutations ... and damaged chromosomes," Aaron Blair, a scientist emeritus at the National Cancer Institute, said in an interview.

Blair chaired the 17-member working group of the WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which rocked the agricultural industry on March 20 by classifying glyphosate as "probably" cancer-causing.

Etiquetas: , , , , ,

sábado, marzo 21, 2015

WHO: Monsanto's Most Used Herbicide 'Probably' Causes Cancer

martes, octubre 28, 2014

Herbicides Used with GM Crops Cause Steep Monarch Butterfly Decline in North America

http://www.biosafety-info.net/article.php?aid=1105


THIRD WORLD NETWORK BIOSAFETY INFORMATION SERVICE

A news report cites an alarming 90% drop in the Monarch butterfly population in North America, attributed to the decline in milkweed, which is the only food the caterpillars eat. The Monarch (Danaus plexippus) is one of the world’s greatest insect migrators; it flies some 4,800 km from Canada to Mexico over four generations.
The huge reduction in milkweed is attributed by scientists to the widespread cultivation of Roundup Ready GM crops in the U.S., which uses massive amounts of the herbicide, glyphosate. Monarch numbers have dropped from one billion in the mid-90s to only 35 million in 2013-2014.
Organizations including the Center for Biological Diversity, the Center for Food Safety, and the Xerces Society have filed a petition with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list the Monarch as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
“The monarch is the canary in the cornfield,” says Lincoln Brower, a Monarch expert, “a harbinger of environmental change that we’ve brought about on such a broad scale that many species of pollinators are now at risk if we don’t take action to protect them.”
With best wishes 
Third World Network
131 Jalan Macalister
10400 Penang
Malaysia
Email: twnet@po.jaring.my
Website: http://www.biosafety-info.net/ and http://www.twn.my/
To unsubscribe: reply ‘unsubscribe’ to news@biosafety-info.net
To subscribe to other TWN information services: www.twnnews.net
'CANARY IN THE CORNFIELD': MONARCH BUTTERFLY MAY GET THREATENED SPECIES STATUS
Morgan Erickson-Davis, mongabay.com
Monarch butterflies were once a common sight throughout the North American heartland. In Mexico, where they overwinter, single trees would often be covered in thousands. But declines in milkweed – their caterpillars’ only source of food – have led to a 90 percent decline in monarch numbers. Now, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is reviewing a petition that would grant the iconic species protection through the Endangered Species Act (ESA). 

Etiquetas: , , ,

domingo, mayo 04, 2014

Monsanto Supersizes Farmers' Weed Problem--but Science Can Solve It

jueves, abril 24, 2014

High residues of glyphosate accumulate in Roundup Ready soybeans

http://www.biosafety-info.net/article.php?aid=1063

THIRD WORLD NETWORK BIOSAFETY INFORMATION SERVICE  


Dear friends and colleagues, 

Re: High residues of glyphosate accumulate in Roundup Ready soybeans 

Research published in the peer-reviewed journal Food Chemistry has found residues of glyphosate (and its breakdown product AMPA) in high concentrations in GM soybeans, but not in conventional or organic soybeans. The study examined 31 samples of soybeans grown within a defined area within the state of Iowa, USA.  

GM soy engineered to be glyphosate resistant is the number one GM crop plant. The herbicide glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide globally. For herbicide-resistant GM plants, herbicide co-technology is an integral part of the production system and will always be used by the farmer.  

However, little attention has been given to the residues of herbicides and their metabolites that can potentially accumulate in the final product. Chemical residues, if present, are important because they are clearly a part of a plant’s composition, and they may add toxic properties to the final plant product either by itself or by affecting the plant metabolism. (There has been increasing research demonstrating the potential health impacts of glyphosate.) 

The authors suggest that the increased use of glyphosate on Roundup Ready soybeans in the US, which has contributed to the selection of glyphosate-tolerant weeds, and resulted in a response of increased doses and/or more applications used per season, may explain the plant tissue accumulation of glyphosate.  

Lack of data on pesticide residues in major crop plants is a serious gap of knowledge with potential consequences for human and animal health. The authors therefore recommend the following:

(i)                 increased effort on sampling and testing crop material from the market;

(ii)   testing for possible dose-response effects of chemical residues in long-term feeding studies;

(iii) inclusion of pesticide residue measurements and safety testing in the regulatory system for risk assessment of GM crops; and

(iv) further research on the indirect ecological effects of herbicides and pesticides.  

The study also showed that different agricultural practices may result in a markedly different nutritional composition of soybeans, with organic soybeans having the healthiest nutritional profile compared to GM and conventional soybeans.  

In sum, the data demonstrated that different agricultural practices lead to markedly different end products, i.e. there is no substantial equivalence between the three management systems of herbicide resistant GM, conventional and organic agriculture.  

Etiquetas: , , ,

martes, septiembre 24, 2013

Misgivings About How a Weed Killer Affects the Soil

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/20/business/misgivings-about-how-a-weed-killer-affects-the-soil.html?_r=0

By STEPHANIE STROM
Published: September 19, 2013


David Eggen for The New York Times
Jon Kiel, left, and Verlyn Sneller of the agriculture company Verity with a corn stalk produced without a glyphosate-based herbicide.


Etiquetas: , ,

jueves, junio 20, 2013

EPA to raise allowable limit of glyphosate residue in produce

http://www.organicconsumers.org/bytes/ob384.html

ESSAY OF THE WEEK

Another Monsanto Handout: EPA Set to Raise Limits on Glyphosate

In another glaring example of how Monsanto has the U.S. government in the palm of its Roundup Ready-covered hands, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is poised to raise – yes, raise – the limits for glyphosate residue allowed on fruits and vegetables sold in the U.S. stores. Glyphosate is the key ingredient in Roundup, Monsanto’s widely used broad-spectrum herbicide. The deadline to tell the EPA what you think of its new ruling is July 1.
The new EPA ruling is incomprehensible in light of the barrage of new studies revealing how much more dangerous glyphosate is than we originally thought. Monsanto’s story has always been that Roundup is harmless to animals and humans. Not so, say scientists who point out the many ways in which glyphosate causes widespread systemic damage to human health. One recent study found traces of the poison in the bodies of people in 18 European countries. And far more glyphosate is used in the U.S. than in Europe.
Unless the EPA changes its mind, and decides to protect us rather than Monsanto, flax oil, canola oil, soybean oil and olive oil will be allowed to contain glyphosate residues of over 100,000 times the concentration known to cause cancer. And that’s just the half of it.
Read the essay
View the EPA Regulation
TAKE ACTION BY JULY 1: Tell the EPA to Lower the Allowed Limits for Monsanto’s Roundup!

Etiquetas: , , ,

viernes, octubre 05, 2012

Ban Roundup

http://www.capwiz.com/grassrootsnetroots/issues/alert/?alertid=58917511&type=ML

Ban Monsanto's Birth-Defect-&-Cancer-Causing RoundUp!
Tell the EPA to Ban Glyphosate
Take Action Now!

The EPA is currently conducting a "Registration Review" of glyphosate. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto's herbicide RoundUp. The EPA will be making a final decision no earlier than 2015.
 
The EPA has the power to ban glyphosate, and it should, given glyphosate is:
A new peer-reviewed research paper by the French group of Gilles-Eric Seralini reveals devastating effects on rats fed diets containing genetically modified corn, with and without the herbicide Roundup, as well as Roundup alone. Rats that spent their lives drinking water contaminated with RoundUp (at levels allowed in U.S. drinking water) developed enormous cancerous tumors and died prematurely. Seralini's study extends the work of others which have demonstrated the toxicity and/or endocrine-based impacts of Roundup. This peer-reviewed study has been criticized by scientists with ties to the biotech industry whose views have been widely reported in the popular press, but independent scientists back the study.

Etiquetas: , , ,

jueves, abril 26, 2012

Roundup harmful to amphibians

RE: Roundup Can Cause Morphological Changes in Amphibians
The world's most popular weed killer, Roundup®, can cause abnormal growth in amphibians, according to research published in the March 2012 issue of Ecological Applications. Rick Relyea, University of Pittsburgh professor of biological sciences with extensive research experience, showed that exposure to sublethal and environmentally relevant concentrations of Roundup® caused two species of amphibians to alter their morphology.
Roundup® is widely used in conjunction with GM Roundup Ready herbicide tolerant crops.
According to Relyea, this is the first study to show that a pesticide can induce morphological changes in a vertebrate animal.
"Herbicides are not designed to affect animals, but we are learning that they can have a wide range of surprising effects by altering how hormones work in the bodies of animals. This is important because amphibians not only serve as a barometer of the ecosystem's health, but also as an indicator of potential dangers to other species in the food chain, including humans," he says.
With best wishes,
Third World Network
131 Jalan Macalister,
10400 Penang,
Malaysia
Email: twnet@po.jaring.my
Website: www.biosafety-info.net and www.twnside.org.sg To subscribe to other TWN information services: www.twnnews.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Item 1
New Study Is First to Show That Pesticides Can Induce Morphological Changes in Vertebrate Animals, says Pitt Researcher When exposed to the popular herbicide Roundup®, tadpoles change shape in ways that are normally induced by predators
University of Pittsburg, Mar 30, 2012
Contact: B. Rose Huber | rhuber@pitt.edu | 412-624-4356 | Cell:
412-328-6008
PITTSBURGH- The world's most popular weed killer, Roundup®, can cause amphibians to change shape, according to research published today in Ecological Applications.
Rick Relyea, University of Pittsburgh professor of biological sciences in the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences and director of Pitt's Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, demonstrated that sublethal and environmentally relevant concentrations of Roundup® caused two species of amphibians to alter their morphology. According to Relyea, this is the first study to show that a pesticide can induce morphological changes in a vertebrate animal.

Etiquetas: , ,

domingo, abril 01, 2012

Roundup diluido en un 99,8% continúa siendo tóxico para el ADN humano

http://www.rapaluruguay.org/agrotoxicos/Prensa/Roundup_diluido_continua_siendo_toxico.htm

Por Ethan A. Huff, 23 de febrero de 2012

Un nuevo estudio publicado en la revista Archives of Toxicology viene a mostrar una vez más que no hay nivel seguro ante la exposición al herbicida Roundup de Monsanto (glifosato), preparado para ser utilizado en los organismos genéticamente modificados (OGM). Según los nuevos hallazgos, Roundup, del que se aplican millones de toneladas al año en todo el mundo, sigue siendo tóxico para el ADN humano incluso si se diluye 0,02 por ciento, cantidad que se utiliza normalmente en los cultivos transgénicos.

Numerosos estudios han señalado el hecho de que el Roundup provoca daños en el ADN, sin contar con las alteraciones endocrinas y cancerígenas ya conocidas. Este nuevo estudio, que procede de la Universidad Médica de Viena, es el primero en mostrar que la toxicidad de Roundup se mantiene incluso a niveles muy diluidos, lo cual entra en contradicción con lo que dicen los gigantes de la Agricultura Industrial sobre la supuesta seguridad de Roundup.

“Las comparaciones con los resultados de estudios anteriores sobre los linfocitos y células de los órganos internos indican que las células epiteliales son más susceptibles a los efectos citotóxicos del herbicida, provocando daños en el ADN”, escriben los científicos en el resumen de su estudio.

“Desde que descubrimos los efectos genotóxicos (que dañan el ADN) en una exposición a concentraciones 450 veces por debajo de las utilizadas normalmente en la agricultura, nuestros resultados indican que su inhalación puede provocar daños en el ADN de las personas expuestas”.

Por otro lado, no solo el ingrediente glifosato de Roundup es extremadamente tóxico, sino que aumenta su toxicidad por la presencia de otros aditivos en su formulación, como por ejemplo la polioxietileneamina, surfactante que facilita la absorción del glifosato por las células, encontrándose que aumenta de manera significativa la toxicidad sinérgica de Roundup en los seres humanos.

Pese a las afirmaciones de Monsanto en sentido contrario, Roundup muestra con claridad su toxicidad y que no debiera ser utilizado en la agricultura. De acuerdo con datos recompilados por GreenMedInfo.com, Roundup está vinculado con el linfoma no-Hodgkin, desequilibrio hormonal en los niños, daño en el ADN, bajos niveles de testosterona, alteraciones endocrinas, cáncer de hígado, meningitis, infertilidad, cáncer de piel, daño en los riñones…

Para el medio ambiente, el Roundup es una amenaza constante, para el aire y el agua, sobre todo para las aguas subterráneas y potables, ya que los estudios han demostrado que no se biodegrada después de ser aplicado en los cultivos.

El pasado otoño, el Servicio Geológico de Estados Unidos (USGS) publicó datos que muestran que el aire y el agua estan altamente contaminados con glifosato.

Otros artículos relacionados:
http://noticiasdeabajo.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/investigaciones-del-profesor-andres-carrasco-que-muestran-relacion-entre-el-roundup-y-los-defectos-congenitos/
http://noticiasdeabajo.wordpress.com/2011/02/22/los-cientificos-advierten-sobre-la-relacion-entre-un-nuevo-y-peligroso-patogeno-y-roundup-de-monsanto/
http://noticiasdeabajo.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/los-campos-de-la-muerte-la-contaminacion-con-agrotoxicos/

Fuente: http://www.naturalnews.com/035050_Roundup_Monsanto_DNA.html#ixzz1njDkcSbX

Etiquetas: ,

jueves, julio 21, 2011

Public kept in the dark on Roundup link with birth defects

*Industry knew since 1980s, regulators since 1990s

Earth
Open Source Press release for immediate release, 7 June 2011
Industry and EU regulators knew as long ago as the 1980s-1990s that Roundup, the world's best selling herbicide, causes birth defects – but they failed to inform the public. This is the conclusion of a new report, "Roundup and birth defects: Is the public being kept in the dark?"
co-authored by a group of international scientists and researchers and released today.[1]
The report reveals that industry's own studies (including one commissioned by Monsanto) showed as long ago as the 1980s that Roundup's active ingredient glyphosate causes birth defects in laboratory animals.
The German government has known about these findings since at least the 1990s, when as the "rapporteur" member state for glyphosate, it reviewed industry's studies for the EU approval of the herbicide. The European Commission has known since at least 2002, when it signed off on glyphosate's approval.
But this information was not made public. On the contrary, regulators have consistently misled the public about glyphosate's safety. As recently as last year, the German Federal Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, BVL, told the Commission there was "no evidence of teratogenicity"
(ability to cause birth defects) for glyphosate.
BVL made this comment in its rebuttal[2] of an independent scientific study published last year by Argentine scientists. The study showed that Roundup and glyphosate cause birth defects in frogs and chickens at concentrations much lower than those used in agricultural spraying.[3] The study was prompted by reports of high rates of birth defects and cancers in areas of South America growing genetically modified (GM) Roundup Ready soy, which is engineered to tolerate being sprayed liberally with glyphosate herbicide.
In its rebuttal of the Argentine study, BVL cited as proof of glyphosate's safety the industry studies submitted for the Commission's 2002 approval of glyphosate (the approval that is currently in force).
But the authors of the new report obtained the approval documents and found that contrary to BVL's claim, industry's own studies, conducted in the 1980s and 1990s, showed that glyphosate/Roundup causes birth defects in experimental animals. In some cases, these effects occurred at low doses.
The German authorities and the EU Commission's ECCO expert review panel[4] whitewashed the findings and the Commission approved the herbicide.
Claire Robinson, a co-author of the new report and spokesperson for the sustainability NGO Earth Open Source, which published it, said, "This looks like a thirty-year cover-up by industry and regulators and it has certainly placed the public at risk. Roundup is used not only by farmers but by home gardeners and in school grounds and other public areas, in part because of false marketing claims that it is safe."
Commission delays review of glyphosate
A new, more stringent pesticide regulation comes into force in the EU this June. An objective review of glyphosate under this new regulation would almost certainly result in a ban. This is because under the regulation, independent studies have to be taken into consideration. Many of these studies, summarised in the new report, show that glyphosate and Roundup cause birth defects, cancer, genetic damage, endocrine disruption, and other serious effects, often at very low doses.
Glyphosate was due to be reviewed in 2012. But late last year, the Commission quietly passed a directive delaying the review of glyphosate and 38 other pesticides until 2015.[5]
Moreover, in 2015, glyphosate will be reviewed under lax, outdated standards. This is because the Commission has failed to complete the data requirements (the tests that industry has to do) for the new regulation in time for industry to do the new tests. So glyphosate will likely sail through its 2015 review and will not be reviewed under up-to-date, more stringent data requirements for another 15 years, in 2030.[6]
Claire Robinson said, "Glyphosate could get a free regulatory ride until 2030, at a time when biotech companies are pressuring the EU for permission to cultivate glyphosate-tolerant GM seeds in Europe. This would lead to a huge increase in the use of glyphosate in Europe, as has happened in North and South America. The beneficiary of the Commission's delay will be the pesticide industry; the victim will be public health.
"The Commission must cancel the delay and conduct an immediate review of glyphosate and Roundup, taking into consideration the independent scientific literature. In the meantime, it must apply the precautionary principle and withdraw the herbicide from use in Europe until the review has been completed."
ENDS
References
1. Antoniou, M., Habib, M., Howard, C.V., Jennings, R.C., Leifert, C., Nodari, R. O., Robinson, C., Fagan, J. 2011. Roundup and birth defects: Is the public being kept in the dark? Earth Open Source. June.
2. BVL, Germany. 2010. Glyphosate – Comments from Germany on the paper by Paganelli, A. et al. (2010): "Glyphosate-based Herbicides Produce Teratogenic Effects on Vertebrates by Impairing Retinoic Acid Signaling".
October 19.
3. Paganelli, A., Gnazzo, V. et al. 2010. Glyphosate-based herbicides produce teratogenic effects on vertebrates by impairing retinoic acid signaling. Chem Res Toxicol 23(10): 1586–1595.
4. This review role is now performed by the EFSA's PPR Panel.
5. European Commission. 2010. Commission Directive 2010/77/EU of 10 November 2010 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards the expiry dates for inclusion in Annex I of certain active substances. OJ L 230, 19.8.1991.
6. The detailed reasons for this delay are explained in the new report.
Details as above.

Etiquetas: , ,

jueves, julio 14, 2011

Enviro impacts of war on weeds

http://www.foodfirst.org/en/Roundup%2C+glyphosate%2C+herbicide

Environmental Impacts of Killing Weeds now resistant to Roundup

Herbicide tolerance and GM crops
Why the world should be ready to round up glyphosate

Round-Up Ready Corn

Glyphosate is the active ingredient in many herbicides sold throughout the world, including the well-known formulation, Roundup. Glyphosate based herbicides are used widely for weed control because they are non-selective; glyphosate kills all vegetation.

Glyphosate has been promoted as ‘safe’. However, mounting scientific evidence questions the safety of glyphosate and its most well known formulation, Roundup. The evidence detailed in this report demonstrates that glyphosate-based products can have adverse impacts on human and animal health, and that a review of their safety for human and animal health is urgently needed.

The report's conclusion
The rapid evolution of weeds that are resistant to glyphosate is a result of farmers becoming over-reliant on one herbicide for weed control. This is particularly associated with GM RR (genetically modified Roundup Ready) crops. Now that resistance to glyphosate is widespread in weeds within GM RR soy, maize and cotton crops, farmers have to resort to using mixtures of herbicides.

Thus, the promise of reduced herbicide use and cheaper and easier weed controls has not been delivered. However, it is clear that GM RR crops have brought about an escalation in the pesticides ‘arms race’, with an increasing toxic burden on the environment involving significant uncertainty about the overall safety of glyphosate for people and biodiversity.

Read the entire report by Greenpeace.

Etiquetas: , , , ,

miércoles, julio 13, 2011

YA ES OFICIAL: ROUNDUP CAUSA DEFECTOS DE NACIMIENTO

Un nuevo informe por parte de algunos científicos de alto nivel lo han clavado, y Monsanto no será feliz. La Agro-gigante ha construido su modelo de negocio, incluidos los cultivos genéticamente modificados (OGM) que dominan el mercado de los EE.UU. en torno a su herbicida de la marca Roundup, y lo último que querrá admitir es que causa defectos de nacimiento.

Pero eso es precisamente lo que un diverso grupo de científicos – incluyendo de la Universidad de Cambridge, King’s College London School of Medicina, y el Instituto de Biología, UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brasil – han encontrado.

Las principales conclusiones:

-La industria (incluyendo Monsanto) ha conocido desde la década de 1980 que el glifosato causa malformaciones en animales de experimentación en dosis elevadas.

-La industria ha sabido desde 1993 que estos efectos también puede ocurrir con dosis bajas y medias.

-El gobierno alemán conocía al menos desde 1998, que el glifosato provoca malformaciones.

-El panel de la Comisión de Expertos Científicos de la UE ya sabía en 1999 que el glifosato provoca malformaciones.

-La Comisión Europea conocía desde 2002 que el glifosato provoca malformaciones. Este fue el año en que la división de la Dirección General de la DG SANCO publicó su informe final del examen, por el que se sientan las bases para la aprobación actual de glifosato.

El informe incluye una buena cantidad de detalles técnicos para mostrar cómo los reguladores se inclinaron hacia atrás para descontar esos estudios, y hacer que pareciese que no había problemas con Roundup.

Cómo ocultarse detrás de la mala ciencia

Un problema importante es que los estudios se realizan de una forma barata y con muy pocos animales, por lo que para observar resultados completos, los investigadores se ven obligados a usar dosis muy altas, así Monsanto puede alegar que las dosis eran muy altas y que por supuesto, serían de gran toxicidad, y que … “No hay evidencia de toxicidad en dosis bajas”.

Sin embargo, estudios independientes (como Suresh, 1993) si muestran toxicidad con dosis bajas. Los reguladores ignoraron por completo estos estudios …

El grupo señaló que, aun cuando aumenta la presión sobre Europa para permitir la venta de semillas transgénicas Roundup Ready (en particular de las de Monsanto infestadas de la administración Obama), la UE ha pospuesto una revisión de la seguridad del Roundup de junio de 2011 a … 2015.

¿Cuánto Roundup estamos comiendo? Se han detectado residuos sustancial en la soja, los trabajadores agrícolas están expuestos en los campos, como también los propietarios que lo utilizan en sus jardines y los transeúntes que respiran cuando es rociado en las carreteras para reducir las malas hierbas.

La cosa es segura, ¿verdad? Se usa en todas partes.

Puede leer el informe completo (en inglés) en:

http://es.scribd.com/doc/57277946/RoundupandBirthDefectsv5

Traducción: elnuevodespertar

Etiquetas: , ,

martes, junio 14, 2011

The Growing Roundup-Resistant Weed Problem

THIRD WORLD NETWORK BIOSAFETY INFORMATION SERVICE

Dear Friends and colleagues,

RE: Growing Roundup-Resistant Weed Problem

The adoption of crops that are genetically engineered to tolerate the herbicide Roundup has resulted in a growing number of weed species that are resistant to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, due to widespread use of the herbicide. This has also led to a decline in the effectiveness of glyphosate as a weed-management tool.

According to weed expert David Mortensen, during the period since the introduction of glyphosate-tolerant crops, the number of weedy plant species that have evolved resistance to glyphosate has increased dramatically, from zero in 1995 to 19 in June of 2010. Based on the most recent data, glyphosate-tolerant weeds were reported on 30,000 sites and affected up to 11.4 million acres, up from 3,251 sites covering about 2.4 million acres in 2007.

The cost of forestalling and controlling herbicide-tolerant weeds is estimated to cost farmers almost $1 billion each year, at an additional cost of $10-20 per acre.

The trend is set to continue and the problem of resistance may worsen if multiple herbicide-tolerant crops are introduced, as increased use of herbicides is expected.

With best wishes,

Third World Network
131 Jalan Macalister,
10400 Penang,
Malaysia
Email: twnet@po.jaring.my
Website: www.biosafety-info.net and www.twnside.org.sg
To subscribe to other TWN information mailing lists: www.twnnews.net



Growing Roundup-resistant weed problem must be dealt with, expert says
Physorg.com
September 14, 2010
http://www.physorg.com/news203697204.html

Growing Roundup-resistant weed problem must be dealt with, expert says

Penn State weed scientist David Mortensen.

(PhysOrg.com) -- When Penn State weed scientist David Mortensen told members of the U.S. House Oversight Committee this summer that the government should restrict the use of herbicide-tolerant crops and impose a tax on biotech seeds to fund research and educational programs for farmers, it caused quite a stir.

Etiquetas: ,

jueves, mayo 12, 2011

Dr. Huber's warning

On January 17, internationally-recognized plant pathologist Dr. Don Huber wrote a letter to USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack warning of the discovery of a new pathogen, a possible link between Roundup Ready (GMO) corn and soybeans, and severe reproductive problems in livestock as well as widespread crop failure.

Less than 3 weeks later, the Obama administration approved 2 new Roundup Ready GMO crops, set to be planted this spring.

Watch Food Democracy Now's interview with Dr. Huber

Etiquetas: , , , , ,

jueves, marzo 03, 2011

Louisiana super weeds

THIRD WORLD NETWORK BIOSAFETY INFORMATION SERVICE

Dear Friends and colleagues,

Re: Lousiana Farmers Battle Herbicides-resistant Weeds

Herbicide-resistant pigweed (Palmer amaranth) is becoming a major headache for farmers at three locations in North Louisiana in the United States.

These weeds have developed resistance to the herbicide glyphosate, which includes Roundup as well as many other glyphosate products, and are found among fields planted with Roundup Ready soybeans or Roundup Ready cotton.

This latest discovery shows that "super-weeds" have spread across much of the US farmbelt, a phenomenon that many critics of genetic engineered organisms have warned about over the years. Several states from Iowa to Georgia, including Arkansas and Mississippi, have had severe outbreaks of herbicide-resistant weeds, including pigweed.

In one of the three Louisiana locations, a cousin of Palmer amaranth, tall water hemp, is suspected of having herbicide resistance, and it has been confirmed in Mississippi.

Fighting herbicide-resistant weeds will be costly to farmers if the experience of affected farmers in other states is any indication. Farmers are likely to face reduced yields and harvest problems and will need to use more herbicides, glyphosate and/or other types of chemicals.

With best wishes,

Third World Network

131 Jalan Macalister,

10400 Penang,

Malaysia

Email: twnet@po.jaring.my

Website: www.biosafety-info.net and www.twnside.org.sg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

LOUISIANA FARMERS FACE ADDED COST OF BATTLING RESISTANT WEED

By Bruce Schultz, Louisiana State University Ag Center, USA AgFax, USA

(http://agfax.com/Content/lousiana-farmers-dealing-with-weeds-02032011.aspx)

3 February 2011

Tests by the LSU AgCenter have confirmed herbicide-resistant pigweed at three locations in north Louisiana.

"We've joined the party," said Daniel Stephenson, LSU AgCenter weed scientist who conducted the testing.

But this party is no celebration, rather, a meeting of the minds by LSU AgCenter scientists to figure out how to combat the problem.

"We're evaluating alternative weed control programs," said Jim Griffin, LSU AgCenter weed scientist. "We'll assist growers in planning control programs where weed control issues have occurred."

Two of the fields were in Tensas Parish, and the third was in Franklin Parish. All three populations are resistant to the herbicide glyphosate, which includes Roundup as well as many other glyphosate products.

Roundup Ready soybeans were grown in one of the Tensas Parish fields, while Roundup Ready cotton was grown in the other two fields, according to Donnie Miller, LSU AgCenter weed scientist and director of the Northeast Research Station.

Last year, Palmer amaranth (pigweed) from Concordia Parish and johnsongrass in Pointe Coupee Parish were confirmed as resistant to glyphosate.

Several states from Iowa to Georgia, including Arkansas and Mississippi, have had severe outbreaks of herbicide-resistant weeds, including pigweed, specifically Palmer amaranth.

Griffin said it's not a surprise that the problem finally surfaced in Louisiana. "It was not a matter of if, but when."

Griffin explained that herbicide resistance is the result of accelerated evolution.

"The process begins with just a few plants with the genetic capacity to survive the herbicide treatment. It is believed that these plants, which occur naturally in the population at a very low level, are not a result of genetic mutation caused by the herbicide. These inherently resistant plants, when exposed to the same herbicide over several years, produce seed. Over time the population slowly shifts such that the resistant weeds become dominant. Since this process is slow, the producer may not notice the problem until large scale weed control failures occur," Griffin said.

The pigweed from Concordia Parish survived amazingly high rates of glyphosate, Stephenson said.

"To kill half the population would have required 54 times the normal rate," Stephenson said.

The Concordia Parish weed was found in 2009 from a field where Roundup Ready cotton had been grown in four consecutive years. In 2009, the farmer noticed pigweed that had not been killed by an aerial application of glyphosate, Stephenson said. Samples of those plants were used to obtain seeds that were grown in a greenhouse and tested with varying rates of glyphosate.

The same protocol was used on johnsongrass that could not be killed with glyphosate alone. It was found in a field in Pointe Coupee Parish where Roundup Ready soybeans had been grown for 10 years.

Also in Concordia Parish, a cousin of Palmer amaranth, tall water hemp, is suspected of having herbicide resistance, and it has been confirmed in Mississippi by Mississippi State University, he said. In other states, including Arkansas and Mississippi, herbicide-resistant weeds have caused headaches for farmers, with reduced yields and harvest problems caused by the large weeds.

Palmer amaranth can grow up to an inch a day, expanding to a 4- to 6-inch diameter trunk that can damage harvest equipment. It thrives in heat that normally would suppress other weeds, Stephenson said. Its pollen can move up to 600 meters, making neighboring fields vulnerable. One plant can produce up to 2 million seeds. Their small size makes it impossible to clean all seeds from farm equipment.

But weed experts say the problem in Louisiana is manageable.

"Louisiana is at a point where we can mitigate this," Stephenson said.

"We've got the opportunity to not be like our neighbors."

He said growers in Concordia Parish are working together to fight the weed. They are using herbicides with residual action.

Stephenson said alternative herbicides, such as Valor, Dual, Reflex or Magnum, which have different modes of action to kill pigweed, can be used separately or with glyphosate.

Miller said chemical companies are offering rebates and other incentives for growers to use alternative herbicides.

Stephenson warned that using reduced rates of herbicides to save money is false economy.

During field scouting for insects and diseases, he said, farmers can destroy weeds to prevent seed production.

"Growing Liberty link soybeans where Ignite is used for weed control would also be a means to manage glyphosate-resistant weed problems," Griffin said.

The Liberty Link gene is also available for other crops, including corn and cotton.

Griffin said crop rotation is another strategy, provided the rotational crop would be something other than one that relies on glyphosate for primary weed control. For example, he said, rice would be a good rotational choice.

Stephenson said addressing the problem will cost farmers more money, but it is less expensive than what farmers are facing in Arkansas. "It comes down to pay me now, or pay me later."

He said the Palmer amaranth problem may be overshadowed by the herbicide-resistant johnsongrass.

"With Palmer, I have bullets to control it, but with johnsongrass, I only have one bullet," he said. That is because in some areas of the state johnsongrass has already been shown to be resistant to herbicides that could be used as alternatives to glyphosate. That puts us in a real dilemma.

He said chemical companies are working on new compounds to fight the weeds, but a new product is at least 10-12 years away. Weed scientists agree that glyphosate was the discovery of a lifetime, and nothing like it is on the horizon.

"There is no silver bullet coming," Stephenson said.

Glyphosate was discovered by a team of researchers led by John E. Franz, a Monsanto Co. chemist, in 1970.

The herbicide kills plants by interfering with an enzyme required for growth. It is absorbed through its leaves and moves throughout the plant, and it is quickly broken down in the soil by bacteria.

Using herbicide-resistant crops has enabled farmers to lessen their environmental impact by reducing their reliance on plowing to kill weeds.

Using minimal or no-till practices leaves soil more intact and reduces runoff from fields into waterways. It also means farmers don't have to burn as much fuel to grow a crop, keeping food prices lower and helping farmers cut their expenses.

Although Roundup Ready technology has been accepted in cotton, soybeans and corn in the northern United States where sugar beets are grown, litigation involving the Roundup Ready version of that commodity has growers in a quandary. A federal judge has ruled that Roundup Ready beets cannot be planted this year until a full environmental impact study is conducted for the genetically altered variety, even though the genetically modified variety has been grown for the past six years on 95 percent of the sugar beet acreage in 10 states.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture decided this month it will allow Roundup Ready alfalfa to be commercially grown. The USDA reversed an earlier decision that would have imposed restrictions on where it could be grown. A 230-page environmental impact study was completed, but opponents are contending it was not an in-depth examination.

Etiquetas: , ,

martes, febrero 08, 2011

Roundup sucks! Do you need any further proof?

TO READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE: http://www.responsibletechnology.org/blog/664
Jeffrey Smith The world’s leading consumer advocate promoting healthier, non-GMO choices Posted on January 14, 2011

Monsanto’s Roundup Triggers Over 40 Plant Diseases and Endangers Human and Animal Health

The following article reveals the devastating and unprecedented impact that Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide is having on the health of our soil, plants, animals, and human population. On top of this perfect storm, the USDA now wants to approve Roundup Ready alfalfa, which will exacerbate this calamity. Please tell USDA Secretary Vilsack not to approve Monsanto’s alfalfa today.

While visiting a seed corn dealer’s demonstration plots in Iowa last fall, Dr. Don Huber walked passed a soybean field and noticed a distinct line separating severely diseased yellowing soybeans on the right from healthy green plants on the left (see photo). The yellow section was suffering from Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS), a serious plant disease that ravaged the Midwest in 2009 and ’10, driving down yields and profits. Something had caused that area of soybeans to be highly susceptible and Don had a good idea what it was.

The diseased field on the right had glyphosate applied the previous season. Photo by Don Huber

Don Huber spent 35 years as a plant pathologist at Purdue University and knows a lot about what causes green plants to turn yellow and die prematurely. He asked the seed dealer why the SDS was so severe in the one area of the field and not the other. “Did you plant something there last year that wasn’t planted in the rest of the field?” he asked. Sure enough, precisely where the severe SDS was, the dealer had grown alfalfa, which he later killed off at the end of the season by spraying a glyphosate-based herbicide (such as Roundup). The healthy part of the field, on the other hand, had been planted to sweet corn and hadn’t received glyphosate.

This was yet another confirmation that Roundup was triggering SDS. In many fields, the evidence is even more obvious. The disease was most severe at the ends of rows where the herbicide applicator looped back to make another pass (see photo). That’s where extra Roundup was applied.

Don’s a scientist; it takes more than a few photos for him to draw conclusions. But Don’s got more—lots more. For over 20 years, Don studied Roundup’s active ingredient glyphosate. He’s one of the world’s experts. And he can rattle off study after study that eliminate any doubt that glyphosate is contributing not only to the huge increase in SDS, but to the outbreak of numerous other diseases. (See selected reading list.)

Sudden Death Syndrome is more severe at the ends of rows, where Roundup dose is strongest. Photo by Amy Bandy.

Roundup: The perfect storm for plant disease

More than 30% of all herbicides sprayed anywhere contain glyphosate—the world’s bestselling weed killer. It was patented by Monsanto for use in their Roundup brand, which became more popular when they introduced “Roundup Ready” crops starting in 1996. These genetically modified (GM) plants, which now include soy, corn, cotton, canola, and sugar beets, have inserted genetic material from viruses and bacteria that allows the crops to withstand applications of normally deadly Roundup.

(Monsanto requires farmers who buy Roundup Ready seeds to only use the company’s Roundup brand of glyphosate. This has extended the company’s grip on the glyphosate market, even after its patent expired in 2000.)

The herbicide doesn’t destroy plants directly. It rather cooks up a unique perfect storm of conditions that revs up disease-causing organisms in the soil, and at the same time wipes out plant defenses against those diseases. The mechanisms are well-documented but rarely cited.

  1. The glyphosate molecule grabs vital nutrients and doesn’t let them go. This process is called chelation and was actually the original property for which glyphosate was patented in 1964. It was only 10 years later that it was patented as an herbicide. When applied to crops, it deprives them of vital minerals necessary for healthy plant function—especially for resisting serious soilborne diseases. The importance of minerals for protecting against disease is well established. In fact, mineral availability was the single most important measurement used by several famous plant breeders to identify disease-resistant varieties.
  1. Glyphosate annihilates beneficial soil organisms, such as Pseudomonas and Bacillus bacteria that live around the roots. Since they facilitate the uptake of plant nutrients and suppress disease-causing organisms, their untimely deaths means the plant gets even weaker and the pathogens even stronger.
  1. The herbicide can interfere with photosynthesis, reduce water use efficiency, lower lignin , damage and shorten root systems, cause plants to release important sugars, and change soil pH—all of which can negatively affect crop health.
  1. Glyphosate itself is slightly toxic to plants. It also breaks down slowly in soil to form another chemical called AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid) which is also toxic. But even the combined toxic effects of glyphosate and AMPA are not sufficient on their own to kill plants. It has been demonstrated numerous times since 1984
    Glyphosate with sterile soil (A) only stunts plant growth. In normal soil (B), pathogens kill the plant. Control (C) shows normal growth.

    that when glyphosate is applied in sterile soil, the plant may be slightly stunted, but it isn’t killed (see photo).

  1. The actual plant assassins, according to Purdue weed scientists and others, are severe disease-causing organisms present in almost all soils. Glyphosate dramatically promotes these, which in turn overrun the weakened crops with deadly infections.

“This is the herbicidal mode of action of glyphosate,” says Don. “It increases susceptibility to disease, suppresses natural disease controls such as beneficial organisms, and promotes virulence of soilborne pathogens at the same time.” In fact, he points out that “If you apply certain fungicides to weeds, it destroys the herbicidal activity of glyphosate!”

By weakening plants and promoting disease, glyphosate opens the door for lots of problems in the field. According to Don, “There are more than 40 diseases of crop plants that are reported to increase with the use of glyphosate, and that number keeps growing as people recognize the association between glyphosate and disease.”

Roundup promotes human and animal toxins

Photo by Robert Kremer

Some of the fungi promoted by glyphosate produce dangerous toxins that can end up in food and feed. Sudden Death Syndrome, for example, is caused by the Fusarium fungus. USDA scientist Robert Kremer found a 500% increase in Fusarium root infection of Roundup Ready soybeans when glyphosate is applied (see photos and chart). Corn, wheat, and many other plants can also suffer from serious Fusarium-based diseases.

But Fusarium’s wrath is not limited to plants. According to a report by the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, toxins from Fusarium on various types of food crops have been associated with disease outbreaks throughout history. They’ve “been linked to the plague epidemics” of medieval Europe, “large-scale human toxicosis in Eastern Europe,” oesophageal cancer in southern Africa and parts of China, joint diseases in Asia and southern Africa, and a blood disorder in Russia. Fusarium toxins have also been shown to cause animal diseases and induce infertility.

As Roundup use rises, plant disease skyrockets

When Roundup Ready crops were introduced in 1996, Monsanto boldly claimed that herbicide use would drop as a result. It did—slightly—for three years. But over the next 10 years, it grew considerably. Total herbicide use in the US jumped by a whopping 383 million pounds in the 13 years after GMOs came on the scene. The greatest contributor is Roundup.

Over time, many types of weeds that would once keel over with just a tiny dose of Roundup now require heavier and heavier applications. Some are nearly invincible. In reality, these super-weeds are resistant not to the glyphosate itself, but to the soilborne pathogens that normally do the killing in Roundup sprayed fields.

Having hundreds of thousands of acres infested with weeds that resist plant disease and weed killer has been devastating to many US farmers, whose first response is to pour on more and more Roundup. Its use is now accelerating. Nearly half of the huge 13-year increase in herbicide use took place in just the last 2 years. This has serious implications.

As US farmers drench more than 135 million acres of Roundup Ready crops with Roundup, plant diseases are enjoying an unprecedented explosion across America’s most productive crop lands. Don rattles off a lengthy list of diseases that were once under effective management and control, but are now creating severe hardship. (The list includes SDS and Corynespora root rot of soybeans, citrus variegated chlorosis (CVC), Fusarium wilt of cotton, Verticillium wilt of potato, take-all root, crown, and stem blight of cereals, Fusarium root and crown rot, Fusarium head blight, Pythium root rot and damping off, Goss’ wilt of corn, and many more.)

In Brazil, the new “Mad Soy Disease” is ravaging huge tracts of soybean acreage. Although scientists have not yet determined its cause, Don points out that various symptoms resemble a rice disease (bakanae) which is caused by Fusarium.

Corn dies young

In recent years, corn plants and entire fields in the Midwest have been dying earlier and earlier due to various diseases. Seasoned and observant farmers say they’re never seen anything like it.

“A decade ago, corn plants remained green and healthy well into September,” says Bob Streit, an agronomist in Iowa. “But over the last three years, diseases have turned the plants yellow, then brown, about 8 to 10 days earlier each season. In 2010, yellowing started around July 7th and yield losses were devastating for many growers.”

Bob and other crop experts believe that the increased use of glyphosate is the primary contributor to this disease trend. It has already reduced corn yields significantly. “If the corn dies much earlier,” says Bob, “it might collapse the corn harvest in the US, and threaten the food chain that it supports.”

A question of bugs

In addition to promoting plant diseases, which is well-established, spraying Roundup might also promote insects. That’s because many bugs seek sick plants. Scientists point out that healthy plants produce nutrients in a form that many insects cannot assimilate. Thus, farmers around the world report less insect problems among high quality, nutrient-dense crops. Weaker plants, on the other hand, create insect smorgasbords. This suggests that plants ravaged with diseases promoted by glyphosate may also attract more insects, which in turn will increase the use of toxic pesticides. More study is needed to confirm this.

Roundup persists in the environment

Monsanto used to boast that Roundup is biodegradable, claiming that it breaks down quickly in the soil. But courts in the US and Europe disagreed and found them guilty of false advertising. In fact, Monsanto’s own test data revealed that only 2% of the product broke down after 28 days.

Whether glyphosate degrades in weeks, months, or years varies widely due to factors in the soil, including pH, clay , types of minerals, residues from Roundup Ready crops, and the presence of the specialized enzymes needed to break down the herbicide molecule. In some conditions, glyphosate can grab hold of soil nutrients and remain stable for long periods. One study showed that it took up to 22 years for glyphosate to degrade only half its volume! So much for trusting Monsanto’s product claims.


Glyphosate can attack from above and below. It can drift over from a neighbors farm and wreak havoc. And it can even be released from dying weeds, travel through the soil, and then be taken up by healthy crops.

The amount of glyphosate that can cause damage is tiny. European scientists demonstrated that less than half an ounce per acre inhibits the ability of plants to take up and transport essential micronutrients (see chart).

As a result, more and more farmers are finding that crops planted in years after Roundup is applied suffer from weakened defenses and increased soilborne diseases. The situation is getting worse for many reasons.

  1. The glyphosate concentration in the soil builds up season after season with each subsequent application.
  2. Glyphosate can also accumulate for 6-8 years inside perennial plants like alfalfa, which get sprayed over and over.
  3. Long-term Field 2.jpg
    Wheat affected after 10 years of glyphosate field applications.

    Glyphosate residues in the soil that become bound and immobilized can be reactivated by the application of phosphate fertilizers or through other methods. Potato growers in the West and Midwest, for example, have experienced severe losses from glyphosate that has been reactivated.

  4. Glyphosate can find its way onto farmland accidentally, through drifting spray, in contaminated water, and even through chicken manure!

Imagine the shock of farmers who spread chicken manure in their fields to add nutrients, but instead found that the glyphosate in the manure tied up nutrients in the soil, promoted plant disease, and killed off weeds or crops. Test results of the manure showed glyphosate/AMPA concentrations at a whopping 0.36-0.75 parts per million (ppm). The normal herbicidal rate of glyphosate is about 0.5 ppm/acre.

Manure from other animals may also be spreading the herbicide, since US livestock consume copious amounts of glyphosate—which accumulates in corn kernels and soybeans. If it isn’t found in livestock manure (or urine), that may be even worse. If glyphosate is not exiting the animal, it must be accumulating with every meal, ending up in our meat and possibly milk.

Add this threat to the already high glyphosate residues inside our own diets due to corn and soybeans, and we have yet another serious problem threatening our health. Glyphosate has been linked to sterility, hormone disruption, abnormal and lower sperm counts, miscarriages, placental cell death, birth defects, and cancer, to name a few. (See resource list on glyphosate health effects.)

Nutrient loss in humans and animals

The same nutrients that glyphosate chelates and deprives plants are also vital for human and animal health. These include iron, zinc, copper, manganese, magnesium, calcium, boron, and others. Deficiencies of these elements in our diets, alone or in combination, are known to interfere with vital enzyme systems and cause a long list of disorders and diseases.

Alzheimer’s, for example, is linked with reduced copper and manganese. Don Huber points out that this disease has jumped 9000% since 1990.

Manganese, zinc, and copper are also vital for proper functioning of the SOD (superoxide dismustase) cycle. This is key for stemming inflammation and is an important component in detoxifying unwanted chemical compounds in humans and animals.

Glyphosate-induced mineral deficiencies can easily go unidentified and untreated. Even when laboratory tests are done, they can sometimes detect adequate mineral levels, but miss the fact that glyphosate has already rendered them unusable.

Glyphosate can tie up minerals for years and years, essentially removing them from the pool of nutrients available for plants, animals, and humans. If we combine the more than 135 million pounds of glyphosate-based herbicides applied in the US in 2010 with total applications over the past 30 years, we may have already eliminated millions of pounds of nutrients from our food supply.

This loss is something we simply can’t afford. We’re already suffering from progressive nutrient deprivation even without Roundup. In a UK study, for example, they found between 16-76% less nutrients in 1991, compared to levels in the same foods in 1940.

TO READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE: http://www.responsibletechnology.org/blog/664

Etiquetas: , ,